Kodak Gold Max 200 135-24 (4 Pack), 200 ASA (157389)

Pros: Unsurpassed detail, skin color rendition, clarity and colors. My ONLY choice for film.

Cons: Cost (Compared to Fuji).

The Bottom Line: An excellent film for all your picture taking needs. Wonderful for all conditions, except very low light and fast action.

Review: Kodak Gold 200 is my film that use when I need good pictures and I need memories saved for as long as possible, and as brilliantly as possible. I have tried Fuji, Kodak, and Agfa and I am most satisfied with Kodak. The color that comes from a Kodak...

Pros: Inexpensive, clear, and bright

Cons: I can't really see any cons to this.

The Bottom Line: It's great, buy it yourself and see.

Review: On our vacation in Vegas, our digital camera went out so we had to take out our old fashion 35mm. Depressed because the photos wouldn't be as good I loaded up the Kodak Gold 200 film I purchased.
When the pictures came back I was so happy that I had...

Pros: The pictures come out great; they have never faded.

Cons: The Gold 200 is not as versatile as the Max 400.

The Bottom Line: I would recommend Kodak Gold 200 for anyone who wants good quality pictures not taken in low light or with fast action.

Review: A little background: I am not a professional photographer nor is photography a hobby of mine. I do take pictures, though, and a lot of them. My pictures are my prized possessions and I would, like many of you, be devastated if anything happened to...

Pros: Great for indoor or outdoor use, great color

Cons: none

The Bottom Line: Perfect for amateur photographers. Idiot proof with good results.

Review: How appropriate. My 200th review is on Kodak Gold 200 film.

Kodak film is the grand daddy of photo processing. In 1888 George Eastman created the first camera to sell to the public. For $25 you could get a preloaded camera that would shoot...

Pros: Great for snapshots in any light

Cons: Not if you want high clarity.

The Bottom Line: For taking snapshots of friends and family in most light conditions this film with give good results.

Review: As an avid photographer, from developing my own black and white photos to now taking photos of on the go kids I have tried lots of different film for my Minolta Camera.
I now mainly use Kodak Gold 200 as I like the colors and clear definition...

Pros: Vivid colors. Fairly priced. Excellent for prints and enlargements.

Cons: None.

The Bottom Line: I recommend this type of film for all around photography, especially in low light situations. The vividness of the colors is also very attractive.

Review: I'm an amateur photographer. I have taken hundreds of pictures over the years and used several types of film but Kodak Gold 200 is at the top of my list for several reasons.

First of all it's very versatile. It's a general, all purpose film...

Pros: Good quality, good brand

Cons: none

The Bottom Line: Good, sharp, less grain but less versatile than Kodak Max 400.

Review: I consider myself as an amateur in photography. First i knew nothing about photography, and at that time i was confused with what film should i use? At that time, I saw that those ASA 200 films are the most one sold in the store, so i bought one. I...